You Can Enter Cantor’s Paradise!
ثبت نشده
چکیده
I will try to use a spiralic presentation returning to the same points on higher levels hence repeating ourselves, so that a reader lost somewhere, will not go away empty handed. Also I will assume essentially no particular knowledge and I will say little on the history to which many great mathematicians contributed. 1. Hilbert's first problem Recall (Cantor): • We say that two sets A, B are equinumerous (or equivalent) if there is a one-to-one and onto mapping from A onto B; • The Continuum Hypothesis, CH, is the following statement: every infinite set of reals is either equinumerous with the set Q of rational numbers, or is equinumerous with the set R of all reals; • For a set X, let P(X) denote its power set, i.e., the set of all subsets of X. The Generalized Continuum Hypothesis, GCH, is the statement asserting that for every infinite set X, every subset Y of the power set P(X) is either equinumerous with a subset of X, or is equinumerous with P(X) itself. I think this problem is better understood in the context of: 1.1. Cardinal Arithmetic. Recall (Cantor), that we call two sets A, B equivalent (or equinumerous) if there is a one-to-one mapping from A onto B; the number of elements of A is the equivalence class of A denoted by |A|, we call it also the power or the cardinality of A. Having defined infinite numbers, we can naturally ask ourselves what is the natural meaning of the arithmetical operations and the order. There can be little doubt concerning the order: • |A| ≤ |B| iff A is equivalent to some subset of B. We know that • any two infinite cardinals are comparable so it is really a linear order • any cardinal λ has a successor λ + , which means that • λ < µ ⇔ λ + ≤ µ.
منابع مشابه
Hilbert’s First and Second Problems and the Foundations of Mathematics
In , David Hilbert gave a seminal lecture in which he spoke about a list of unsolved problems in mathematics that he deemed to be of outstanding importance. The first of these was Cantor’s continuum problem, which has to do with infinite numbers with which Cantor revolutionised set theory. The smallest infinite number, א0, ‘aleph-nought,’ gives the number of positive whole numbers. A set is...
متن کاملCantor-von Neumann Set-theory
In this elementary paper we establish a few novel results in set theory; their interest is wholly foundational-philosophical in motivation. We show that in Cantor-Von Neumann Set-Theory, which is a reformulation of Von Neumann’s original theory of functions and things that does not introduce ‘classes’ (let alone ‘proper classes’), developed in the 1920ies, both the Pairing Axiom and ‘half’ the ...
متن کاملWas Cantor Surprised?
We look at the circumstances and context of Cantor’s famous remark, “I see it, but I don’t believe it.” We argue that, rather than denoting astonishment at his result, the remark pointed to Cantor’s worry about the correctness of his proof. Mathematicians love to tell each other stories. We tell them to our students too, and they eventually pass them on. One of our favorites, and one that I hea...
متن کاملIntertwining metaphysics and mathematics: the development of Georg Cantor’s set theory 1871-1887
This article discusses Georg Cantor’s philosophical defence of the existence of actual infinities in mathematics. The metaphysical background to Cantor’s argument is documented, emphasizing the philosophical references in Cantor’s main work, Grundlagen (1883). Cantor’s engagement with the history of philosophy, particularly the writings of Spinoza and Leibniz on infinity, is also documented. Fi...
متن کاملCantor on Frege’s Foundations of Arithmetic Cantor’s 1885 review of Frege’s Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik
In 1885, Georg Cantor published his review of Gottlob Frege’s Grundlagen der Arithmetik. In this essay we provide its first English translation together with an introductory note. We also provide a translation of a note by Ernst Zermelo on Cantor’s review, and a new translation of Frege’s brief response to Cantor. In recent years it has entered philosophical folklore that Cantor’s 1885 review o...
متن کامل